Bringing Elton and Grinnell Together: a quantitative framework to represent the biogeography of ecological interaction networks

By Dominique Gravel, Benjamin Baiser, Jennifer A. Dunne, J. Kopelke, Neo D. Martinez, T. Nyman, Timothée Poisot, Daniel B. Stouffer, J. Tylianakis, Spencer A. Wood and 1 more. bioRxiv, 2016

116 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Biogeography has traditionally focused on the spatial distribution and abundance of species. Both are driven by the way species interact with one another, but also by the way these interactions vary across time and space. Here, we call for an integrated approach, adopting the view that community structure is best represented as a network of ecological interactions, and show how it translates to biogeography questions. We propose that the ecological niche should encompass the effect of the environment on species distribution (the Grinnellian dimension of the niche) and on the ecological interactions among them (the Eltonian dimension). Starting from this concept, we develop a quantitative theory to explain turnover of interactions in space and time i.e. a novel approach to interaction distribution modelling. We apply this framework to host parasite interactions across Europe and find that two aspects of the environment (temperature and precipitation) exert a strong imprint on species co-occurrence, but not on species interactions. Even where species co-occur, interaction proves to be stochastic rather than deterministic, adding to variation in realized network structure. We also find that a large majority of host-parasite pairs are never found together, thus precluding any inferences regarding their probability to interact. This first attempt to explain variation of network structure at large spatial scales opens new perspectives at the interface of species distribution modelling and community ecology.

Subfields: Ecological Modeling, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2485543d641effe57ca0df971d2efff6ea2c3dfd

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecological Modeling

  1. Paulo Roberto Guimaraes Jr.
  2. Anders Nielsen
  3. K. Burns

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

  1. Paulo Roberto Guimaraes Jr.
  2. Mário Almeida-Neto
  3. Werner Ulrich
  4. Anders Nielsen
  5. K. Burns

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

  1. Paulo Roberto Guimaraes Jr.
  2. Mário Almeida-Neto
  3. Werner Ulrich
  4. Anders Nielsen
  5. K. Burns

Citations in the corpus