The Impact of War on Trade: An Interrupted Times-Series Study

By Charles H. Anderton, J. R. Carter. 2001

218 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Demography, Development, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2481e5fe9119f572eb6277fe0a7911e811e19f83

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Demography

1. Beth A. Simmons
2. G. Schneider
3. Vera E. Troeger

In Development

1. Beth A. Simmons
2. Ilgaz Arikan
3. Vera E. Troeger
4. Oded Shenkar
5. Eric Neumayer
6. Fabrizio Gilardi
7. Davide Romelli
8. David M. J. Lazer

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Beth A. Simmons
2. G. Schneider
3. Ilgaz Arikan
4. Vera E. Troeger
5. Oded Shenkar

Citations in the corpus

• War and the World Economy (2006, background): “…and Israel, for which the reaction patterns to conflict and cooperation are similar for all three stock markets, illustrate the importance of the liberal disruption thesis advanced by Anderton and Carter (2001a, 2001b, 2003) and criticized by Barbieri and Levy (1999, 2001, 2003) especially well.”
• National Animosity and Cross-Border Alliances (2013, background): “Conflicts disrupt economic activity for a long time (Anderton & Carter, 2001), but the duration and severity of impact vary by conflict motivation.”
• Rules over Real Estate (2005, background): “Most obviously, a latent dispute could become active, involving trade sanctions or property destruction on a significant scale (Anderton and Carter 2001; Li and Sacko 2002; but see Barbieri and Levy 2001).”