Reducing emissions from deforestation and degradation (REDD): An Overview of Risks And Opportunities For The Poor
By Mikkel Flunder. 2009
112 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/247d6fe2e06e425e63b66b7f1d929151a147cc94
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- E. Turnhout
- Aarti Gupta
- Janice Weatherley-Singh
- M. J. Vijge
- J. de Koning
- I. Visseren-Hamakers
- Markus Lederer
- Lennart Olsson
Citations in the corpus
- Creating incentives for avoiding further deforestation: the nested approach (2009, background): “…baseline (Moutinho et al., 2005; Santilli et al., 2005; Environmental Defense and the Amazon Institute for Environmental Research (IPAM), 2007; Ogonowski et al., 2007; Greenpeace, 2008; Strassburg et al., 2008), as well as the UNFCCC submissions of the EU and the Coalition of Rainforest…”
- Adaptation and the poor: development, resilience and transition (2008, background): “Concerning the environment, adaptation to climate change needs to be related to other international environmental regimes such as the United Nations Convention on Biodiversity (UNCBD) and the United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification (UNCCD).”
- Envisioning REDD+ in a post‐Paris era: between evolving expectations and current practice (2017, background): “In light of the future financial prospects for REDD+ vis-à-vis carbon benefits noted above, this diversity of funding may prove a useful strategy for securing the necessary financing for diverse REDD+ interventions, while at the same time ensuring the delivery of co-benefits.(70) Such a strategy wou”