The nonconforming virtual element method
By Blanca Ayuso de Dios, Konstantin Lipnikov, Gianmarco Manzini. 2014
301 citations recorded by the source corpus.
We introduce the nonconforming Virtual Element Method (VEM) for the approximation of second order elliptic problems. We present the construction of the new element in two and three dimensions, highlighting the main differences with the conforming VEM and the classical nonconforming finite element methods. We provide the error analysis and establish the equivalence with a family of mimetic finite difference methods.
Subfields: Computational Mechanics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Mechanics of Materials
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/246f126ba2353865e241df32cf858662e9680bca
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Computational Mechanics
- L. Beirão da Veiga
- Paola Francesca Antonietti
- Bernardo Cockburn
- Alessandro Russo
- Gianmarco Manzini
- L. Donatella Marini
- Marco Verani
- Franco Brezzi
In Electrical and Electronic Engineering
- L. Beirão da Veiga
- Bernardo Cockburn
- Paola Francesca Antonietti
- Alexandre Ern
- Alessandro Russo
- Franco Brezzi
- L. Donatella Marini
- Daniele A. Di Pietro
In Mechanics of Materials
- L. Beirão da Veiga
- Alessandro Russo
- Gianmarco Manzini
- L. Donatella Marini
- Paola Francesca Antonietti
- Franco Brezzi
- Bernardo Cockburn
- Marco Verani
Citations in the corpus
- A multigrid algorithm for the $p$-version of the Virtual Element Method (2017, methodology): “refer to [7] and [29], respectively. Moreover, several variants of the Virtual Element Method, including mixed, H(div) and H(curl)-conforming, serendipity and nonconforming VEMs have been proposed in [11,14,18{20,33,39,56]. All the above mentioned contributions focus on the h{version of the Virtual ”
- Conforming and nonconforming virtual element methods for elliptic problems (2015, unknown): “(E): The proof that the combined set of degrees of freedom is unisolvent for the conforming space is given in [1], and for the nonconforming space follows exactly as the original unisolvence proof in [3]. It is based on the observation that each space denes its elements as those functions which solv”
- Bridging the hybrid high-order and hybridizable discontinuous Galerkin methods (2016, methodology): “17)), whereas the stabilization r sT is a special instance of the one appearing in the right-hand side of ([2], Eq.”
- A Hybrid High-Order method for the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations based on Temam's device (2018, unknown): “The HHO method we present here can therefore be considered as a higher-order extension of the HMM scheme for Navier–Stokes as in [32, 33] As shown in [24, Section 4], the HHO method for diffusion equations is very close to the non-conforming Virtual Element Method (VEM) [4] and the high-order mixed M”
- A Plane Wave Virtual Element Method for the Helmholtz Problem (2015, background): “The basic VEM introduced on the Poisson problem has then been extended to highly regular [11], non conforming [2] and discontinuous approximating spaces [16], to general elliptic [8] and mixed problems [6,7,14], as well as to Stokes [1], plate problems [15], linear and non linear elasticity [5, 10, ”
- Virtual element method for quasilinear elliptic problems (2017, unknown): “ularity assumption used in the linear setting [6, 17], allowing for very general polygonal and polyhedral meshes. Virtual element methods for linear elliptic problems are now well-established, see eg.[6, 11, 1, 10, 5, 17, 13] and [26] for a simple implementation. See also [7] for an extension to mes”
- Serendipity Virtual Elements for General Elliptic Equations in Three Dimensions (2018, result): “We here mention, in addition to the ones above, a sample of papers [1, 9, 18, 4, 12, 16, 26, 22] and refer to [24] for a more complete survey of the existing VEM literature.”