1 Trend Filtering
By Seung-Jean Kim, Kwangmoo Koh, Stephen P. Boyd, Dimitry M. Gorinevsky. 2009
658 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Applied Mathematics, Computational Mechanics, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Applied Mathematics
- Robert Tibshirani
- Veeranjaneyulu Sadhanala
- Aaditya Ramdas
- Sainan Jin
- Jonathan E. Taylor
- Peter C. B. Phillips
- Stephen P. Boyd
- Daniela M. Witten
In Computational Mechanics
- Robert Tibshirani
- Veeranjaneyulu Sadhanala
- Jonathan E. Taylor
- Aaditya Ramdas
- Noah R. Simon
- Paul Fearnhead
- Adam N. Letchford
- Robert Maidstone
In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
- Robert Tibshirani
- Jonathan E. Taylor
- Stephen P. Boyd
- Daniela M. Witten
- Nicholas Alexander Johnson
- Noah R. Simon
- Aaditya Ramdas
- Veeranjaneyulu Sadhanala
Citations in the corpus
- Additive models with trend filtering (2017, methodology): “In general, the efficiency of backfitting hinges on the efficiency of the univariate smoother employed; in practice, to implement Algorithm 1 we can use fast interior point methods (Kim et al. 2009) or fast operator splitting methods (Ramdas & Tibshirani 2016) for univariate trend filtering, both of”
- Fused Lasso Additive Model (2014, methodology): “3.3 CONNECTIONS TO OTHER METHODS The fused lasso can be interpreted as 1 trend filtering with order k = 0 (Kim et al. 2009; Tibshirani 2014).”
- Adaptive piecewise polynomial estimation via trend filtering (2013, methodology): “2 [Kim et al. (2009) focus mainly on linear trend filtering, the case k = 1, but their arguments carry over to the general case as well.]”
- Real-Time Convex Optimization in Signal Processing (2010, background): “The same ideas are applied to reconstructing signals with sparse derivative (or gradient, more generally) in total variation de-noising, and in signals with sparse second derivative (or Laplacian) [50].”
- A Dynamic Programming Algorithm for the Fused Lasso and L0-Segmentation (2013, background): “( 2009 ) to solve the FLSA, and the running time is listed under the heading “QP”.”
- The Hodrick-Prescott Filter A Special Case of Penalized Spline Smoothing (2010, methodology): “The origins of the method date back to, among others, Parker and Rice (1985), who comment on the use of smoothing with (penalized) splines as an alternative to smoothing splines.”
- Detecting Changes in Slope With an L0 Penalty (2017, methodology): “The other approach we compare to is the trend-filtering algorithm (Kim et al. 2009).”
- Fast and Flexible ADMM Algorithms for Trend Filtering (2014, methodology): “To simultaneously estimate a trend and detect outliers, we solve (ˆ β, ˆ z ) = argmin as in Kim et al. (2009), She & Owen (2011), where the nonzero components of ˆ z correspond to the adaptively detected outliers.”
- The generalized lasso is reducible to a subspace constrained lasso (2013, neutral): “A range of interesting applications of this idea have already emerged including the fused lasso [14], trend filtering [15], wavelet smoothing [16].”
- Trend Filtering Methods for Momentum Strategies (2011, methodology): “To find x̂, we may also use the quadratic programming algorithm, but Kim et al. (2009) suggest using the primal-dual interior point method in order to optimise the numerical computation speed.”