The Economic Consequences of IPO Spinning

By Xiaoding Liu, Jay R. Ritter. 2010

136 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2460c6af02cbff6e89a6e06530560ca1a8dad806

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

1. Chen Lin
2. Audra L. Boone
3. Jarrad Harford
4. Tao Chen
5. Ioannis V. Floros
6. Shane A. Johnson
7. Nihat Aktas
8. Kenneth R. Ahern

Citations in the corpus

• Do Analysts Matter for Governance? Evidence from Natural Experiments (2015, methodology): “25 For more information about the construction of the dataset, see Liu and Ritter (2010, 2011).”
• Local Underwriter Oligopolies and IPO Underpricing (2011, unknown): “Empirically, the analyst lust hypothesis is examined by Cliff and Denis (2004) and the spinning hypothesis is examined by Liu and Ritter (2010).”
• Redacting Proprietary Information at the Initial Public Offering (2015, background): “…9 Explanations for the observed relationship between include VC backing and underpricing include the grandstanding hypothesis by Gompers (1996) and the spinning hypothesis by Loughran and Ritter (2002) and Liu and Ritter (2010).”