Implementing typed feature structure grammars
By Ann A. Copestake. CSLI lecture notes series, 2001
475 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/245d8673ab2857863ea691ded6292c44c544cc08
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Julia Hockenmaier
- Zhao Hai
- Junru Zhou
- Mark Steedman
- Miriam Butt
- Helge Dyvik
- Christian Rohrer
- Hiroshi Mashuichi
Citations in the corpus
- CCGbank: A Corpus of CCG Derivations and Dependency Structures Extracted from the Penn Treebank (2007, background): “This phenomenon could be handled elegantly with a feature hierarchy over categories as proposed by Copestake (2002), Villavicencio (2002), and McConville (2007).”
- Accuracy vs. Robustness in Grammar Engineering (2010, methodology): “Ann Copestake and Stephan Oepen each authored software platforms central to the ERG’s implementation (LKB: Copestake, 2002, [incr tsdb()]: Oepen & Carroll, 2000) and both continue as vital contributors to its development.”
- Enriching Parallel Corpora for Statistical Machine Translation with Semantic Negation Rephrasing (2012, methodology): “The same grammars used for parsing can also be used by the generator of the Lexical Knowledge Builder Environment (Copestake, 2002) to generate an n-best list of surface realizations given an MRS structure.”
- The Parallel Grammar Project (2002, methodology): “In the Verbmobil project (Wahlster, 2000), HPSG grammars for English, German, and Japanese were developed on two platforms: LKB (Copestake, 2002) and PAGE.”
- Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar Parsing on Penn Treebank (2019, methodology): “Such as the Enju English and Chinese parser (Miyao et al., 2004; Yu et al., 2010), the Alpino parser for Dutch (Van Noord et al., 2006), and the LKB & PET (Copestake, 2002; Callmeier, 2000) for English, German, and Japanese..”
- Vector Symbolic Architectures answer Jackendoff's challenges for cognitive neuroscience (2004, background): “However, there is an alternative interpretation of the concept of a variable that is based on declarative programming languages and is more congenial to constraint-based grammar formalisms (Copestake, 2002).”