Age-adjusted D-dimer cutoff levels to rule out pulmonary embolism: the ADJUST-PE study.
By M. Righini, J. van Es, P. D. den Exter, P. Roy, F. Verschuren, A. Ghuysen, O. Rutschmann, O. Sanchez, M. Jaffrelot, A. Trinh-Duc and 17 more. Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), 2014
876 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Internal Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/245c7e76a244f8a077bfe7661a14b97252aecf9a
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
In Internal Medicine
In Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
Citations in the corpus
- ESC Guidelines on the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism (2014, background): “3%), without any additional false-negative findings.(123) D-dimer is also more frequently elevated in patients with cancer,(124,125) in hospitalized patients,(105,126) and during pregnancy.”
- [2014 ESC Guidelines on the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism]. (2014, positive): “3%), without any additional false-negative findings.(123) D-dimer is also more frequently elevated in patients with cancer,(124,125) in hospitalized patients,(105,126) and during pregnancy.”
- Comparison between different D‐Dimer cutoff values to assess the individual risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism: analysis of results obtained in the DULCIS study (2016, neutral): “prospectively investigated to rule out PE [19].”