J.A. Gray's reinforcement sensitivity theory and frustrative nonreward: A theoretical note on expectancies in reactions to rewarding stimuli

128 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Reinforcement sensitivity theory and personality. (2004, unknown): “These findings, on the other hand, appear in line with the “joint subsystems hypothesis” (Corr, 2002) that predicts for the impulsive subjects at all levels of anxiety a lower level of sensitivity to signals of punishment (p.888 Corr, 2002).”
Validation of the Measure of Revised Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory Constructs (2014, background): “An additional problem concerning the BAS measures is the relationship between individual differences in sensitivity to reward and real reactions to (experimenter-defined) reward stimuli in experimental conditions (Corr, 2002).”
Anger and the behavioral approach system (2003, background): “Also consistent with the idea of BAS being positively related to anger, Corr (2002) has suggested that in humans high levels of BAS should be associated with higher expectancies for rewards, which should cause higher levels of frustration upon termination or reduction of the magnitude of reward (s”
The relations between anger, coping with anger, and aggression, and the BIS/BAS system (2005, background): “Recently, however, several authors have argued that BIS and BAS may not be uniquely related to either negative or positive emotions (Carver, 2004; Corr, 2002; Harmon-Jones, 2003; Putman, Hermans, & van Honk, 2004).”
From BIS/BAS to the big five (2006, unknown): “20: 255–270 (2006) actually reach the positive (Carver, 2004; Corr, 2002; Harmon-Jones, 2003).”