Presolving in linear programming
By Erling D. Andersen, Knud D. Andersen. 1995
Subfields: Mathematical Optimization
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Mathematical Optimization
- Alper Atamtürk
- Martin W. P. Savelsbergh
- Kees Roos
- Tamás Terlaky
- Pietro Belotti
- Stephen P. Boyd
- Steven Diamond
- Akshay Agrawal
Citations in the corpus
- Integer-Programming Software Systems (2005, methodology): “We refer the reader to [3, 28, 31, 53] for detailed explanation of preprocessing techniques.”
- The Mosek Interior Point Optimizer for Linear Programming: An Implementation of the Homogeneous Algorithm (2000, background): “It is now common to include an extensive preprocessing facility in an LP solver, where the purpose of the preprocessing is to remove obviously redundant constraints and fixed variables, see [5].”
- Progress in presolving for mixed integer programming (2015, methodology): “[15] and Williams [28] discussed bound tightening, row elimination, and variable fixings in mathematical programming systems, while Andersen and Andersen [6] published presolving techniques in the context of linear programming.”
- A Rewriting System for Convex Optimization Problems (2017, methodology): “Andersen and Andersen (1995) cast presolves as reductions, listing many examples for linear programs together with methods for retrieving their solutions.”
- On implementing a primal-dual interior-point method for conic quadratic optimization (2003, methodology): “Before the problem is optimized it is preprocessed to remove obvious redundancies using most of the techniques presented in [4].”
- On handling indicator constraints in mixed integer programming (2016, methodology): “A specialized version of this procedure applies to affine functions, and is commonly used in MIP solvers, see [1].”
- Lower bound limit analysis of cohesive‐frictional materials using second‐order cone programming (2006, background): “Tests conducted by Andersen and Andersen [56] have indicated that the removal of dependent rows during presolve can provide substantial net savings in solution time, as well as better stability during the main optimization phase.”
- The SCIP Optimization Suite 3.2 (2016, unknown): “, [ ̄̀j , ūj ] ⊆ [`j , uj ], variable xj is said to be implied free [7].”
- Linear and Nonlinear Optimization (2008, background): “As an initial basis use the extreme points (0, 0), (0, 5), and (9, 5).”
- Mixed-integer nonlinear optimization*† (2013, methodology): “It is part of nonlinear optimization solvers (Messine, 2004) as well as of MILP solvers (Andersen and Andersen, 1995; Savelsbergh, 1994).”