Sentience and Animal Welfare

By D. Broom. 2014

187 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Genetics, Small Animals

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2413517131be9abaf2c74ae047d29cfd42c80aa4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. V. Réquillart
2. Céline Bonnet
3. Z. Bouamra‐Mechemache
4. Nicolas Treich
5. K. Grunert
6. Stergios Athanassoglou

Citations in the corpus

• Animal sentience and the precautionary principle (2017, unknown): “This is appropriate since the content and implementation is likely to vary a great deal depending on the animals in question: the components of good welfare for octopods, for example, differ from the components of good welfare for sheep or cattle (Broom 2014).”
• Viewpoint: Regulating meat consumption to improve health, the environment and animal welfare (2020, background): “The literature on animal sciences has long used various indicators for welfare, such as the rate of mortality or injuries, impaired growth, the reproduction or immune system, measures of stereotypes and self-narcotization, stress hormone levels, space allotment, and transport time (Broom, 2014).”