The continuous strength method

By L. Gardner. 2008

233 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Many of the principal concepts that underpin current metallic structural design codes were developed on the basis of bilinear (elastic, perfectly-plastic) material behaviour; such material behaviour lends itself to the concept of section classification. The continuous strength method represents an alternative treatment to cross-section classification, which is based on a continuous relationship between slenderness and (inelastic) local buckling and a rational exploitation of strain hardening. The development and application of the continuous strength method to structural steel design is described herein. Materials that exhibit a high degree of nonlinearity and strain hardening, such as aluminium, stainless steel and some high-strength steels, fit less appropriately into the framework of cross-section classification, and generally benefit to a greater extent from the continuous strength method. The method provides better agreement with test results in comparison to existing design codes, and offers increas...

Subfields: Building and Construction, Civil and Structural Engineering

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2412dea9e8656c8293d28e160cc84ab7d2b71ba3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Building and Construction

  1. L. Gardner
  2. X. Yun
  3. Najib Saliba
  4. F. Wang
  5. N. Saari
  6. C. Buchanan
  7. A. Liew
  8. B. Young

In Civil and Structural Engineering

  1. L. Gardner
  2. X. Yun
  3. Najib Saliba
  4. F. Wang
  5. N. Saari
  6. C. Buchanan
  7. A. Liew
  8. S. Afshan

Citations in the corpus