Application-independent evaluation of speaker detection
By Niko Brummer. The Speaker and Language Recognition Workshop, 2004
706 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2407fd206cb6ec594801b69cfa5cade67bfbfcd2
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
Citations in the corpus
- Optimization Algorithms and Applications for Speech and Language Processing (2013, methodology): “In this paper, we focus on optimization of the parameters of the component models.”
- The Albayzin 2008 Language Recognition Evaluation (2010, methodology): “In such cases, it was planned to evaluate systems also in terms of the so called CLLR [5], which is used as an alternative performance measure in NIST evaluations.”
- The Speakers in the Wild (SITW) Speaker Recognition Database (2016, background): “For more information on this metric, please refer to [9].”
- Spoken Language Recognition: From Fundamentals to Practice (2013, background): “The system that gives the highest likelihood score makes the best sense of the speech and is considered as the recognition result.”
- An Introduction to Application-Independent Evaluation of Speaker Recognition Systems (2007, background): “The interested reader may consult [3] for further motivation of this parametrization.”