The face in the crowd revisited: a threat advantage with schematic stimuli.

By A. Ohman, Daniel Lundqvist, Francisco Esteves. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2001

1,465 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/240247d67cc26cd7474e02ed75de6682e181839d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. Mara Mather
2. L. Carstensen
3. David Sander
4. Andrew E. Reed
5. Jenny Yiend
6. Manuel G. Calvo
7. A. Ohman
8. Vanessa Lobue

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Gernot Horstmann
2. Jenny Yiend
3. A. Ohman
4. Manuel G. Calvo
5. Mara Mather
6. S. Mineka
7. Vanessa Lobue
8. Ernst H. W. Koster

Citations in the corpus

• Preattentive face processing: What do visual search experiments with schematic faces tell us? (2007, methodology): “Stimulus size is also a possible issue: Ohman et al . (2001) , and Fox et al. (2000)”
• The effects of emotion on attention: A review of attentional processing of emotional information (2010, background): “Additional studies looking at individual differences have mostly reported clear betweenparticipant differences in specific phobias (Ohman et al., 2001a) and social anxiety (Gilboa-Schechtman, Foa, & Amir, 1999).”
• Electrophysiological correlates of rapid spatial orienting towards fearful faces. (2004, neutral): “…in dot-probe tasks (Mogg and Bradley, 1999; Mogg et al., 2000), visual search (Hansen and Hansen, 1988; Fox et al., 2000; Eastwood et al., 2001; Öhman et al., 2001), stroop interference (Pratto and John, 1991; Williams et al., 1996) and attentional blink experiments (Anderson and Phelps, 2001).”
• Affective Judgments of Faces Modulate Early Activity (∼160 ms) within the Fusiform Gyri (2002, background): “, angry or fearful faces) may be processed more quickly and accurately (Öhman et al., 2001) and thus may possibly evoke stronger FG activation.”
• Seeing and mastering difficulty: The role of affective change in achievement flow (2010, background): “For example, the tendency to restore positive affect (mastery) could be assessed in a face-discrimination task (Ohman, Lundqvist, & Esteves, 2001 ).”
• Event-related potentials to schematic faces in social phobia (2007, methodology): “…faces or fear-relevant stimuli as compared to positive faces or neutral objects, respectively (e.g., Fox et al., 2000; Hansen & Hansen, 1988; Öhman et al., 2001; Tipples, Atkinson, & Young, 2002*which however comprised visual search tasks in contrast to the emotion identification task in…”
• The role of lateral orbitofrontal cortex in the inhibitory control of emotion (2006, background): “…anxious people are quicker than non-anxious people to detect threatening stimuli in the environment; spider phobics are quicker than snake phobics to detect photographs of spiders among snakes and snake phobics are quicker than spider phobics to detect snakes among spiders (Ohman et al. 2001a, b).”
• Evolutionary derived modulations of attention to two common fear stimuli: Serpents and hostile humans (2012, result): “5; Lundqvist & Ohman, 2005 ; Mather & Knight, 2005 ; Ohman, Lundqvist, & Esteves, 2001 ; See Ohman, Juth, & Lundqvist, 2010, for further references) but the results from studies that like Hansen and Hansen ( 1988 ) used photographically depicted real faces (eg, Figure 2 ) are highly inconsiste”