THREE METHODS FOR ASSESSING RICHNESS AND COMPOSITION OF SMALL MAMMAL COMMUNITIES
By I. Torre, A. Arrizabalaga, Carles Flaquer. 2004
121 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Abstract Analysis of pellets of Tyto alba and scats of Genetta genetta and Sherman livetrapping were compared to assess richness and composition of small mammal communities in a Mediterranean area (NE Spain). Owl pellets provided 17 small mammal species (17,232 individuals), genet scats 14 species (2,145 individuals), and livetrapping 9 species (1,488 individuals). Owl pellets oversampled insectivores and grassland rodents and undersampled tree-dwelling and woodland rodents. Genet scats and livetrapping oversampled woodland rodents and undersampled insectivores and grassland rodents. After controlling for sample size and elevation differences between methods by means of analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) and rarefaction, owl pellets contained higher richness for small samples (<50 individuals), and scats contained higher richness for large samples (>100 individuals), both having higher richness than livetrapping regardless of sample size. We concluded that both indirect methods provided complementary information of small mammal communities, detecting the 19 small mammal species known to be present in the study area.
Subfields: Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/24006e34fb76f62109b8adc0ec81e5994194e71a
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
Citations in the corpus
- On raptors and rodents: testing the ecological fidelity and spatiotemporal resolution of cave death assemblages (2010, background): “It should be noted that trapping does not necessarily provide an accurate assessment of the local small-mammal community (e.g., Jaksic et al. 1999; Torre et al. 2004), owing to a suite of potential biasing factors.”