Responses of moist non-acidic arctic tundra to altered environment: productivity, biomass, and species richness
84 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Atmospheric Science, Ecology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/23feda730f026ffc8b191edc849bdcd8d12819c1
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Atmospheric Science
In Ecology
Citations in the corpus
- Luxury consumption of soil nutrients: a possible competitive strategy in above‐ground and below‐ground biomass allocation and root morphology for slow‐growing arctic vegetation? (2003, background): “We determined above-ground and below-ground biomass of the vascular plants in control and fertilized plots on non-acidic tussock tundra (Gough et al. 2000; Gough & Hobbie 2003 ), after 4 years of annual treatment with nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P).”
- Nutrient limitation and botanical diversity in wetlands: can fertilisation raise species richness? (2005, background): “:P ratios and to become more dominant after N fertilisation (De Kroon and Bobbink 1997, Pauli et al. 2002, Gough and Hobbie 2003, Güsewell et al. 2003).”
- Ecosystem properties determined by plant functional group identity (2010, background): “…of future change in arctic vegetation is likely to be increased nutrient availability (Dormann & Woodin 2002), and grasses are particularly responsive to fertilization in a longer-term experiment in our region (Turkington et al. 2002) and in general (Dormann & Woodin 2002; Gough & Hobbie 2003).”
- Do individual plant species show predictable responses to nitrogen addition across multiple experiments (2005, background): “Details on experiments and sites can be found for ARC (Shaver et al. 1996, Gough et al. 2002, Gough and Hobbie 2003 ), CRP (unpubl.), CDR (Inouye et al. 1987, Tilman 1987, Wedin and Tilman 1996), GCE (Pennings et al. 2002), JRG (Shaw et al. 2002, Zavaleta et al. 2003), KBS (Huberty et al. 1998), KN”