Cost and performance of fossil fuel power plants with CO2 capture and storage

By Edward S. Rubin, Chao Chen, A. Rao. 2007

742 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Environmental Engineering, Global and Planetary Change, Mechanical Engineering

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/23faecf2791df3bd318d30a15a1d46ea71c83f11

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Environmental Engineering

In Global and Planetary Change

In Mechanical Engineering

Citations in the corpus

Techno-economic appraisal of fossil-fuelled power generation systems with carbon dioxide capture and (2011, background): “These sources have previously been widely used in connection with US studies [13, 36-38], as well as in the earlier appraisal of the thermodynamic and ‘exergoeconomic’ performance of NGCC plant with and without carbon capture by Hammond and Ondo Akwe [8].”
Economic-Emission Dispatch Problem in Power Systems With Carbon Capture Power Plants (2021, background): “Although the CCS systems might be a valuable technology for CO2 reduction, the energy requirements of these systems increase the fuel consumption of the plants which can affect their performance and may lead to increasing other multimedia emissions [6].”
Sustainable energy systems: Role of optimization modeling techniques in power generation and supply—A review (2011, background): “[130] E.S. Rubin et al. 2007 A Study summarizing and comparing the results of recent studies of the current cost of fossil fuel power systems with and without CO2 capture, including pulverized coal (PC) combustion plants, coal-based integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC) plants, and natural…”
Economic Evaluation of IGCC Plants with Hot Gas Cleaning (2012, background): “The superiority of plant configuration 2 in Rubin et al. (2007) is self-evident as EOR drastically reduces the storage costs of CO2.”
Geoengineering impact of open ocean dissolution of olivine on atmospheric CO2, surface ocean pH and marine biology (2013, background): “Depending on the type of energy production (Rubin et al 2007) this might release as much as 350 (gas) to 800 (coal) g of CO2 per kWh reducing carbon sequestration efficiency by up to 30%.”
Post-combustion carbon capture (2020, methodology): “4 CO2 capture from power plant exhausts involves techniques of post- or pre-combustion capture, or oxy-fuel combustion, as illustrated in Figure 1[10].”
A proposed methodology for CO2 capture and storage cost estimates (2013, background): “Numerical examples in that paper indicated that such inconsistencies can result in sizeable differences (often 20% or more) in the reported cost of otherwise identical systems (Rubin, 2012; Rubin et al., 2007).”
Exergy and economic analyses of advanced IGCC–CCS and IGFC–CCS power plants (2013, methodology): “The capital and labor costs for the entrained flow gasifier, the gas turbine, the steam turbine, and cooling towers were averaged from the values in the IECM model [5] and those from Gerdes et al. [16,17].”