Coupling of Integral Acoustics Methods with LES for Jet Noise Prediction

By A. Uzun, Anastasios S. Lyrintzis, G. Blaisdell. 2004

167 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Aerospace Engineering, Computational Mechanics, Environmental Engineering

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/23dbcd60c159cd0579c4cfcc37bb9892a9f0867c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Aerospace Engineering

1. Oliver T. Schmidt
2. Aaron Towne
3. Tim Colonius
4. G. Brès
5. P. Jordan
6. André V. G. Cavalieri
7. Sanjiva K. Lele
8. V. Jaunet

In Computational Mechanics

1. Tim Colonius
2. Oliver T. Schmidt
3. Aaron Towne
4. G. Brès
5. P. Jordan
6. André V. G. Cavalieri
7. Sanjiva K. Lele
8. P. Spalart

In Environmental Engineering

1. Tim Colonius
2. Oliver T. Schmidt
3. Aaron Towne
4. P. Jordan
5. P. Spalart
6. André V. G. Cavalieri
7. G. Brès
8. M. Shur

Citations in the corpus

• Current Status of Jet Noise Predictions Using Large-Eddy Simulation (2008, unknown): “(UBL) [36–39] investigated theMach 0.”
• Importance of the nozzle-exit boundary-layer state in subsonic turbulent jets (2018, background): “In the early LES studies (e.g., Morris et al. 2002; Uzun et al. 2004; Bodony & Lele 2005; Bogey & Bailly 2005), the nozzle geometry was typically not considered and simulations relied on the introduction of disturbances at the inlet of the computation domain to force transition.”
• Noise Prediction for Increasingly Complex Jets. Part I: Methods and Tests (2005, background): “The recent studies of Uzun et al [16] and Lew et al [17] are modern and thorough, which provides a good basis to illustrate some of the persistent issues, as well as the contrasts between methods.”