RBFT: Redundant Byzantine Fault Tolerance

By Pierre-Louis Aublin, Sonia Ben Mokhtar, Vivien Quéma. IEEE International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems, 2013

299 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Computer Networks and Communications, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/23d1b1c49166a449830a69439a56a54f017202e7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Computer Networks and Communications

1. Elaine Shi
2. Andrew K. Miller
3. Dawn Song
4. Guy Golan-Gueta
5. Benny Pinkas
6. Michael K. Reiter
7. Dahlia Malkhi
8. Ittai Abraham

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Vincent Gramoli
2. Ethan Buchman
3. Marko Vukolic

Citations in the corpus

• The Honey Badger of BFT Protocols (2016, methodology): “[22] initiated a recent line of work [4, 6, 10, 21, 22, 50] by advocating improvement of the worst-case performance, providing service quality guarantees even when the system is under attack — even if this comes at the expense of performance in the optimistic case.”
• SBFT: A Scalable and Decentralized Trust Infrastructure (2018, methodology): “We use c + 1 collectors for redundancy in the fast path (inspired by RBFT [17]).”
• A First Look at Identity Management Schemes on the Blockchain (2018, background): “iated with a specific identifier and is, written, distributed and replicated among the steward nodes, which run an enhanced version of the redundant Byzantine fault tolerant protocol of Aublin et al. [10], called Plenum, for consensus. There are two important consequences to the choice of permission”