Efficient Computationally Private Information Retrieval from Anonymity or Trapdoor Groups
By Jonathan T. Trostle, Andy Parrish. 2010
70 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Srinath T. V. Setty
- Ian Goldberg
- Michael Walfish
- Laurent Fousse
- Marc-Olivier Killijian
- Joris Barrier
- Carlos Aguilar Melchor
- Femi G. Olumofin
Citations in the corpus
- XPIR : Private Information Retrieval for Everyone (2016, background): “First and foremost this paper shows that cPIR is a usable primitive in a large variety of settings, with standard security assumptions and conservative parameter choices.”
- Revisiting the Computational Practicality of Private Information Retrieval (2011, background): “This is an important clarification to make because PIR-processing with most multi-server PIR schemes and some single-server PIR schemes [2, 29] costs much less than one modular multiplication per database bit.”
- Scalable and Private Media Consumption with Popcorn (2016, background): “ous CPIR implementations [11, 30, 41, 70, 72, 80, 87, 97, 99, 103], among which XPIR [11] is the fastest.”
- PRISM - Privacy-Preserving Search in MapReduce (2012, methodology): “That is, given b · ei, the probability that A computes low order bits of ei mod N (“LSB”) is negligible [37].”
- Efficient Private File Retrieval by Combining ORAM and PIR (2014, methodology): “Similar to previous work [2], we have used the PIR scheme from Trostle and Parrish [20], because of its conceptual simplicity and efficient server computation (adding two PIR values is simply an integer addition).”