Polyandry and fecundity in the Lepidoptera: can methodological and conceptual approaches bias outcomes?
By L. M. Torres-Vila, M. C. Rodríguez-Molina, Michael D. Jennions. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 2004
99 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/23b59996ae1e9f4b7e721ba5fa13c8b00a13b7b3
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
- L. M. Torres-Vila
- Michael D. Jennions
- D. Gwynne
- Michelle Hollander
- Clint D. Kelly
- Hanna Kokko
- M. Lajeunesse
- Shinichi Nakagawa
In Genetics
Citations in the corpus
- Female fitness consequences of male harassment and copulation in seed beetles, Callosobruchus maculatus (2009, background): “In contrast, during laboratory experiments, females are often confined with a male in a small space to encourage mating (Torres-Vila et al. 2004; Sakurai & Kasuya 2008); however, this may eliminate the natural avoidance response that females may use to reduce harassment costs.”
- Male mating history and female fecundity in the Lepidoptera: do male virgins make better partners? (2005, methodology): “The case is less clear for lepidopterans though (Torres-Vila et al. 2004), especially polyandrous species where males invest relatively more nutrients into spermatophore production (Karlsson 1996).”