Free associations and social representations: some reflections on rank-frequency and importance-frequency methods
By L. Dany, Isabel Urdapilleta, Grégory Lo Monaco. 2015
135 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, General Health Professions, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/23ab42bc9a224aea8ee1d5c3474f604db4895a55
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Social Psychology
Citations in the corpus
- Methods for Studying the Structure of Social Representations: A Critical Review and Agenda for Future Research (2017, methodology): “In fact, the prototypical analysis and the method of hierarchical evocations (see Dany et al., 2015 for a review) provide access to the content but, as we have seen, this methodological option only addresses hypotheses of centrality. Thus, given the issue of the determination of both rank and freque”