Judicial Checks and Balances

By R. La Porta, Florencio Lopez‐de‐Silanes, Cristian Pop-Eleches, A. Shleifer. Journal of Political Economy, 2003

766 citations recorded by the source corpus.

In the Anglo‐American constitutional tradition, judicial checks and balances are often seen as crucial guarantees of freedom. Hayek distinguishes two ways in which the judiciary provides such checks and balances: judicial independence and constitutional review. We create a new database of constitutional rules in 71 countries that reflect these provisions. We find strong support for the proposition that both judicial independence and constitutional review are associated with greater freedom. Consistent with theory, judicial independence accounts for some of the positive effect of common‐law legal origin on measures of economic freedom. The results point to significant benefits of the Anglo‐American system of government for freedom.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/239fb292e41d1a949392817b95321434869287eb

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

  1. A. Shleifer
  2. R. La Porta
  3. Florencio Lopez‐de‐Silanes
  4. Simeon Djankov
  5. Martin Srholec
  6. J. Fagerberg
  7. Narjess Boubakri
  8. Elias Papaioannou

In Sociology and Political Science

  1. A. Shleifer
  2. Walid Saffar
  3. Yann Algan
  4. Simeon Djankov
  5. Claudia R. Williamson
  6. Florencio Lopez‐de‐Silanes
  7. R. La Porta
  8. Holger Spamann

Citations in the corpus