Key indicators to track current progress and future ambition of the Paris Agreement

By G. P. Peters, Robbie M. Andrew, J. Canadell, Sabine Fuss, R. B. Jackson, J. I. Korsbakken, Corinne Le Quéré, Nebojsa Nakicenovic. 2017

384 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Environmental Engineering, Global and Planetary Change

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/238f871b78f7c2f12cb78be0d7b9eb21d82bedbb

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. D. Guan
2. Robbie M. Andrew
3. G. P. Peters
4. J. Minx
5. Yuli Shan
6. Zhifu Mi
7. T. Wiedmann
8. Jiali Zheng

In Environmental Engineering

1. D. Guan
2. Robbie M. Andrew
3. G. P. Peters
4. Yuli Shan
5. Zhifu Mi
6. J. Minx
7. T. Wiedmann
8. Jiali Zheng

In Global and Planetary Change

1. Pete Smith
2. W. Lamb
3. Sabine Fuss
4. J. Minx
5. Robbie M. Andrew
6. D. Guan
7. K. O’Brien
8. M. Callaghan

Citations in the corpus

• Climate Change, Financial Stability and Monetary Policy (2018, neutral): “Jones and Warner, 2016; Peters et al., 2017).”
• Regional development and carbon emissions in China (2019, background): “variable can be decomposed into the product of several factors, where the factor represents the increment of each index (Peters et al., 2017).”
• Negative emissions—Part 3: Innovation and upscaling (2018, background): “In the case of NETs, this process might involve up-scaling to thousands of CCS plants (Herzog 2011, Nemet et al 2015, Peters et al 2017), millions of farms (Lal 2004, Woolf et al 2017), or teragrams of iron added to the ocean (Boyd and Bressac 2016, Hauck et al 2016).”
• Getting to Zero Carbon Emissions in the Electric Power Sector (2018, background): “the scale or pace desired for climate stabilization.(12) Worldwide, deployment”
• Persistent fossil fuel growth threatens the Paris Agreement and planetary health (2019, background): “Replacing fossil fuels with low- and no-carbon alternatives is critical for limiting climate change to 1.5° or 2 °C, but only if such alternatives displace fossil fuels (figure 5) (Peters et al 2017, IPCC 2018, Davis et al 2018).”
• Disruption and low-carbon system transformation: Progress and new challenges in socio-technical transitions research and the Multi-Level Perspective (2017, background): “Despite these ‘glimmers of hope’, low-carbon transitions are progressing slowly, except for renewable electricity [61].”
• Is the 1.5°C target possible? Exploring the three spheres of transformation (2018, background): “warming to 2 C — likely or even possible? This question has dominated science and policy debates in the aftermath of the Paris Agreement on climate change [1,2].”