Leptoquark model to explain the B-physics anomalies, RK and RD
By D. Bevcirevi'c, S. Fajfer, Nejc Kovsnik, O. Sumensari. 2016
276 citations recorded by the source corpus.
We show that a model with a scalar leptoquark of hypercharge $Y=1/6$ which includes the light right-handed neutrinos, can successfully describe both of the $B$-physics anomalies, $R_K^{\rm exp} R_D^{\rm SM}$. We discuss the corresponding low energy effective theory and, after using the known experimental data as constraints, we show that the model is viable and that it offers several predictions which can be tested experimentally.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/238e8e119eb505ad97101a6c979e523853101d39
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- S. Descotes-Genon
- Vladimir Vava Gligorov
- J. Matias
- Tatiana Likhomanenko
- Thomas Ruf
- H. Cai
- B. Fornal
- Andreas Crivellin
In Astronomy and Astrophysics
In Nuclear and High Energy Physics
- S. Descotes-Genon
- J. Virto
- J. Matias
- B. Capdevila
- Andreas Crivellin
- T. Blake
- Vladimir Vava Gligorov
- Simone Bifani
Citations in the corpus
- Physics case for an LHCb Upgrade II - Opportunities in flavour physics, and beyond, in the HL-LHC era (2018, background): “In relation to the anomalies observed, several models [272,276,277] have been developed where the branching fractions of the B→ e±μ∓ can be as large as O(10−11).”
- Baryon number and lepton universality violation in leptoquark and diquark models (2017, methodology): “The leptoquark models providing the best fit to data with just a single new representation are: scalar (3, 2) 1 6 [23], vector”
- Patterns of New Physics in b → sℓ+ℓ− transitions in the light of recent data (2017, background): “[45, 50] are also strongly disfavoured, even though they can account for RK , since they would result in RK∗ > 1.”