Freshwater fisheries assessment using environmental DNA: A primer on the method, its potential, and shortcomings as a conservation tool

By Nathan T. Evans, G. Lamberti. 2018

117 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Molecular Biology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/23835146c06fa1edbb1df55653db387657484bfc

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. B. Stoeckle
2. Christina C. Belle
3. Elise Furlan
4. J. Geist
5. M. Broadhurst
6. J. DiBattista
7. Michael W. Davis

In Molecular Biology

1. Elise Furlan
2. J. Geist
3. B. Stoeckle
4. J. DiBattista
5. Christina C. Belle

Citations in the corpus

• Environmental DNA (eDNA) as a tool for assessing fish biomass: A review of approaches and future considerations for resource surveys (2021, background): “Most of the early research on eDNA was constrained to detecting species presence (Cristescu & Hebert, 2018; Deiner et al., 2017; Evans & Lamberti, 2018; Rees et al., 2014; Thomsen & Willerslev, 2015).”
• Taxonomic and geographical representation of freshwater environmental DNA research in aquatic conservation (2019, background): “…Coissac, Pompanon, Brochmann, & Willerslev, 2012). eDNA techniques provide non‐destructive alternatives to classical survey methods, being most frequently assayed or implemented in aquatic environments (Deiner et al., 2017; Evans & Lamberti, 2018; Roussel, Paillisson, Tréguier, & Petit, 2015).”