Evolving Connectionist Systems: The Knowledge Engineering Approach
By Nikola K. Kasabov. 2007
331 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2371560957a730a3ef6fda5f97f0487cc605a232
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Jérémie Cabessa
- Zoran Bosnic
- K. Dhoble
- Nuttapod Nuntalid
- Giacomo Indiveri
- Hava T. Siegelmann
- Jaka Demsar
- Salvador Garcia
Citations in the corpus
- The Super-Turing Computational Power of plastic Recurrent Neural Networks (2014, background): “In the context of Artificial Intelligence (AI), the consideration of evolving neural architectures in socalled Evolving Connectionist Systems (ECoS) has proven to be fruitful and significantly increased in applications.(6,7) Yet from a theoretical perspective, the general concepts of evolvability an”
- Detecting concept drift in data streams using model explanation (2018, background): “C E A notable group of methods are evolving learners, which continually develop their structure, functionality and internal knowledge representation through learning and interacting with the environment (Angelov et al., 2010; Lughofer, 2011; Kasabov, 2007).”
- Dynamic evolving spiking neural networks for on-line spatio- and spectro-temporal pattern recognition. (2013, methodology): “This idea was used in a class of SNN, called evolving SNN (eSNN) (Kasabov, 2007; Wysoski et al., 2010).”
- NeuCube: A spiking neural network architecture for mapping, learning and understanding of spatio-temporal brain data (2014, unknown): “The second approach does not exclude using evolutionary computation to optimize the GRN as it is the case in the CNGM simulator (Kasabov, 2007; Wysoski et al., 2010).”