Beyond biofuels: assessing global land use for domestic consumption of biomass: a conceptual and empirical contribution to sustainable management of global resources.

By S. Bringezu, Meghan O’brien, H. Schütz. 2012

124 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Environmental Engineering, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Global and Planetary Change

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/236c70d656b4c901079a471b93251c536203e623

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Environmental Engineering

In General Agricultural and Biological Sciences

In Global and Planetary Change

Citations in the corpus

Possible target corridor for sustainable use of global material resources (2015, methodology): “For global cropland use by countries, monitoring methods have been developed [18] and as mentioned above a target of 0.”
Assessing global land use : balancing consumption with sustainable supply (2014, background): “This compares with a global average area of cropland of 2300 m(2) per person (2007; FAOSTAT online database) and the worldwide cropland required for EU’s consumption of 3100 m(2)/person (Bringezu et al. 2012).”
Globalization of land use: distant drivers of land change and geographic displacement of land use (2013, background): “In addition to describing trade in quantities of agricultural and wood products being exchanged, a variety of material flows embodied in, and environmental indicators associated with international trade are also being computed, including: virtual water [37], land resources [38], water and nitrogen [”
Assessing the need for critical minerals to shift the German energy system towards a high proportion of renewables (2015, background): “However, we disregarded the availability of biomass itself and the associated challenges, especially with regard to competing demand for land and biomass use [95,96].”
Measuring telecouplings in the global land system: A review and comparative evaluation of land footprint accounting methods (2015, unknown): “Others disregard non-food products or consider them using coefficients from process-LCA (Bringezu et al., 2012; Bringezu et al., 2009; Kissinger and Rees, 2010; Mayer et al., 2014; von Witzke and Noleppa, 2010).”