Rethinking species' ability to cope with rapid climate change

By C. Hof, Irina Levinsky, Miguel B. Araújo, C. Rahbek. 2011

233 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecological Modeling, Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/23564ec0a5d099bc53a8ca4195b1781a61e2ab75

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecological Modeling

1. Miguel B. Araújo
2. C. Rahbek
3. C. Hof
4. M. Cabeza
5. R. A. Garcia
6. R. Brandl
7. Diogo Alagador
8. Martin P. Brändle

In Ecology

1. Miguel B. Araújo
2. C. Rahbek
3. C. Hof
4. M. Cabeza
5. Diogo Alagador
6. R. A. Garcia
7. N. Burgess
8. A. Kolb

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. Miguel B. Araújo
2. C. Rahbek
3. C. Hof
4. K. Verheyen
5. Christian Messier
6. Martin Hermy
7. R. Brandl
8. I. Aubin

Citations in the corpus

• Large frugivorous birds facilitate functional connectivity of fragmented landscapes (2014, background): “The ability of species to move to new ranges in order to keep within preferred climatic conditions is especially critical considering future climate change scenarios (Loarie et al. 2009; Hof et al. 2011; Kremer et al. 2012; McConkey et al. 2012).”
• Climate change, species range shifts and dispersal corridors: an evaluation of spatial conservation models (2016, background): “Climate change poses major challenges to conservation plan- ning because species distributions are affected in complex and seemingly idiosyncratic ways (Thomas et al. 2004; Hof et al. 2011; Garcia et al. 2014).”
• Climate change impacts in Latin America and the Caribbean and their implications for development (2017, background): “There are some studies on insects (Deutsch et al. 2008), amphibians (Lawler et al. 2009; Sinervo et al. 2010; Hof et al. 2011; Loyola et al. 2013; Mesquita et al. 2013; Lemes et al. 2014), sea turtles (Fish et al. 2005), birds (Anciães and Peterson 2006; Jetz et al. 2007, Marini et al. 2009;…”
• Exploring consensus in 21st century projections of climatically suitable areas for African vertebrates (2011, background): “BEMs rely on assumptions about the association between climate and species distributions, and their biological realism hinges on additional factors influencing species vulnerability to climatic changes, such as ecophysiological and micro-habitat preferences, phenotypic plasticity, evolutionary rates”
• Traits to stay, traits to move: a review of functional traits to assess sensitivity and adaptive capacity of temperate and boreal trees to climate change (2016, background): “Persist in place via adaptive capacity The greatest uncertainty in our current assessments may be understanding species’ capacity to adapt (Hof et al. 2011) and the mechanisms through which they might achieve this (Chmura et al.”
• Latitudinal gradients as natural laboratories to infer species' responses to temperature (2013, background): “are greatest in areas with higher maximum temperatures (Mantyka-Pringle, Martin & Rhodes 2012) and exacerbate the effects of climate change in general as habitat fragmentation impedes distribution range shifts (Davis & Shaw 2001; Hof et al. 2011).”
• PAPER Recent range shifts of European dragonflies provide support for an inverse relationship between habitat predictability and dispersal (2013, background): “The responses of species to climate warming can be basically summarized along three pathways: movement towards suitable climate conditions, evolutionary adaptations or extinction (Holt, 1990; Hof et al., 2011).”