The Effect of Additional Child Support Income on the Risk of Child Maltreatment

By Maria Cancian, Mi‐Youn Yang, K. Slack. Social Service Review, 2013

251 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, General Health Professions, Safety Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/234f8b9490f064321dd2d612bfecae387d3662aa

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. Kerri Raissian
2. Kelley Fong
3. L. Bullinger
4. B. Daniel

In General Health Professions

1. P. Bywaters
2. Kerri Raissian
3. Kelley Fong
4. L. Bullinger
5. Geraldine Brady
6. T. Sparks
7. E. Bos

In Safety Research

1. Kerri Raissian
2. Kelley Fong
3. L. Bullinger

Citations in the corpus

• Exploring inequities in child welfare and child protection services: Explaining the ‘inverse intervention law’ (2015, background): “Copyright a n d m o r al right s for p u blications m a d e available in ORCA a r e r e t ain e d by t h e copyrig ht hold e rs.”
• Concealment and Constraint: Child Protective Services Fears and Poor Mothers' Institutional Engagement (2018, background): “For poor families, additional income reduces CPS reports (Cancian et al. 2013).”
• Money matters: Does the minimum wage affect child maltreatment rates? (2017, background): “There are two exceptions.1 Cancian, Yang, and Slack (2013) use a random assignment experiment in Wisconsin to determine the effect of income, through exogenous increases in child support, on the risk of maltreatment.”
• Getting Eyes in the Home: Child Protective Services Investigations and State Surveillance of Family Life (2020, background): “A growing literature suggests community-level strategies (Daro and Dodge 2009) and broad-scale anti-poverty policies (Berger et al. 2017; Cancian, Yang, and Slack 2013; Raissian and Bullinger 2017; Yang et al. 2019) hold great promise for preventing child maltreatment.”