Thermodynamics as a theory of decision-making with information-processing costs
By Pedro A. Ortega, Daniel A. Braun. 2012
306 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Perfectly rational decision-makers maximize expected utility, but crucially ignore the resource costs incurred when determining optimal actions. Here, we propose a thermodynamically inspired formalization of bounded rational decision-making where information processing is modelled as state changes in thermodynamic systems that can be quantified by differences in free energy. By optimizing a free energy, bounded rational decision-makers trade off expected utility gains and information-processing costs measured by the relative entropy. As a result, the bounded rational decision-making problem can be rephrased in terms of well-known variational principles from statistical physics. In the limit when computational costs are ignored, the maximum expected utility principle is recovered. We discuss links to existing decision-making frameworks and applications to human decision-making experiments that are at odds with expected utility theory. Since most of the mathematical machinery can be borrowed from statistical physics, the main contribution is to re-interpret the formalism of thermodynamic free-energy differences in terms of bounded rational decision-making and to discuss its relationship to human decision-making experiments.
Subfields: Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
- Karl J. Friston
- Pedro A. Ortega
- Hong Jun Jeon
- Anca Dragan
- Smitha Milli
- Greg Wayne
- Giovanni Pezzulo
- Daniel A. Braun
In Statistical and Nonlinear Physics
- Pedro A. Ortega
- Giovanni Pezzulo
- Karl J. Friston
- Nicolas Manfred Otto Heess
- Francesco Rigoli
- Anca Dragan
- Hong Jun Jeon
- Smitha Milli
Citations in the corpus
- The anatomy of choice: active inference and agency (2013, background): “Important examples here include artificial curiosity (Schmidhuber, 1991), empowerment (Klyubin et al., 2005), information to go (Tishby and Polani, 2011) and computational complexity (Ortega and Braun, 2011, 2013).”
- Active inference and epistemic value (2015, background): “Minimizing this divergence is a cornerstone of risk-sensitive control (Van Den Broek, Wiegerinck, & Kappen, 2010) and utilitybased free energy treatments of bounded rationality (Ortega & Braun, 2011, 2013).”
- Active Inference: A Process Theory (2017, background): “…same quantity minimized in risk-sensitive or KL control (Klyubin, Polani, & Nehaniv, 2005; van den Broek, Wiegerinck, & Kappen, 2010), and underpins related variational formulations of bounded rationality based on complexity costs (Braun, Ortega, Theodorou, & Schaal, 2011; Ortega & Braun, 2013).”
- Information-Theoretic Bounded Rationality (2015, methodology): “Perfect Rationality Bounded Rationality Transformations Variational Principle Sequential Decisions Conclusions Axioms of Transformation Costs Let ◮ (Ω,Σ) measurable space; ◮ P(·|·) : (Ω× Ω) → [0, 1] conditional probability measure.”
- Exploiting Hierarchy for Learning and Transfer in KL-regularized RL (2019, background): “Another closely related regularization for RL is using information bottleneck (Tishby & Polani, 2011; Still & Precup, 2012; Rubin et al., 2012; Ortega & Braun, 2013; Tiomkin & Tishby, 2017).”
- Information asymmetry in KL-regularized RL (2019, methodology): “…using tools from information and probability theory (e.g. Tishby & Polani, 2011; Ortega & Braun, 2011; Still & Precup, 2012; Rubin et al., 2012; Ortega & Braun, 2013; Tiomkin & Tishby, 2017), for instance, via constraints on the channel capacity between past states and future actions in a…”
- Reward-rational (implicit) choice: A unifying formalism for reward learning (2020, methodology): “The finding provides validation for the approach pursued by Palan et al. [2019] and Ibarz et al.”
- A Free Energy Principle for Biological Systems (2012, background): “Free energy formulations also provide a powerful account of optimal control beyond biological settings and can be derived axiomatically by considering the information costs and complexity of bounded rational decision-making [24].”