Confounding and collinearity in regression analysis: a cautionary tale and an alternative procedure, illustrated by studies of British voting behaviour
By Ron Johnston, Kelvyn Jones, David Manley. Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, 2017
995 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Many ecological- and individual-level analyses of voting behaviour use multiple regressions with a considerable number of independent variables but few discussions of their results pay any attention to the potential impact of inter-relationships among those independent variables—do they confound the regression parameters and hence their interpretation? Three empirical examples are deployed to address that question, with results which suggest considerable problems. Inter-relationships between variables, even if not approaching high collinearity, can have a substantial impact on regression model results and how they are interpreted in the light of prior expectations. Confounded relationships could be the norm and interpretations open to doubt, unless considerable care is applied in the analyses and an extended principal components method for doing that is introduced and exemplified.
Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Small Animals
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2346984b33844f65f5198f4503f6981d19358ee6
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Citations in the corpus
- Using an LLM to Help with Code Understanding (2023, result): “These results indicate that the participants felt less rushed when using GILT than when using search engines, and they felt more successful in accomplishing the task with the tool than with search engines, but there were no significant differences in other dimensions.”