Chest Compression Rates During Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Are Suboptimal: A Prospective Study During In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest

By B. Abella, N. Sandbo, Peter Vassilatos, J. Alvarado, N. O’Hearn, H. Wigder, P. Hoffman, Kathleen Tynus, T. V. Vanden Hoek, L. Becker. Circulation, 2005

747 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Emergency Medicine, Epidemiology, Physiology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2329efbec85408784f5a4dc25c0c49e240c41612

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. C. Sandroni
2. M. Antonelli
3. F. Cavallaro

Citations in the corpus

• In-hospital cardiac arrest: incidence, prognosis and possible measures to improve survival (2007, background): “However, two recent observational studies conducted on IHCA demonstrated that both depth and rate of chest compression performed by CAT members were insufficient in about one-third of cases [60], and that chest compression rates below 80/min were associated with a significantly lower immediate survi”
• Effects of compression depth and pre-shock pauses predict defibrillation failure during cardiac arrest. (2006, neutral): “Pre-shock pause (s), median (IQR) [n = 53] 11.9 (6.8—19.4) 22.7 (15.6—37.7) 15.3 (8.3—23.5) 0.002 a No flow time (s), median (IQR) [n = 49] 4.8 (0.6—13.8) 0.0 (0.0—9.1) 4.5 (0.0—13.3) 0.15 a Compression rate (min−1), mean (S.D.) [n = 49] 114 (17) 120 (23) 116 ( 19 ) 0.31”