Spatial Effects and Ecological Inference

By Luc Anselin, Wendy K. Tam Cho. Political Analysis, 2002

155 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

IDENTIFYING AND I NTERPRETING R EGIONAL CONVERGENCE CLUSTERS ACROSS EUROPE (2005, unknown): “A Question of Aggregation There is some evidence that the degree of convergence varies according to the scale at which regional differences (contrasts) are measured.3 For example, it is 3 See, for example, Arbia (1986; 1989), Armhein (1995), Anselin and Cho (2002).”
Regional Convergence And The Impact Of European Structural Funds Over 1989-1999: A Spatial Econometric Analysis (2008, background): “In the literature, this problem is referred as the modifiable areal unit problem (MAUP) (Arbia, 1989; Anselin and Cho, 2000).”
Distribution of regional income and regional funds in Europe 1989–1999: An exploratory spatial data analysis (2005, background): “In the literature, this problem is referred to the modifiable areal unit problem (MAUP) (see Openshaw and Taylor, 1979), and also considered as an example of ecological fallacy (Anselin and Cho, 2000).”
Under the hood (2002, methodology): “For a discussion of the role of spatial effects in this model, see Anselin and Cho (2002) .”