Bivalve Filter Feeding: Variability and Limits of the Aquaculture Biofilter

By P. Cranford, J. E. Ward, S. Shumway. 2011

226 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Oceanography

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2308f148ff015a5ddb837ae12d1b4217f4ce00bf

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Global and Planetary Change

1. G. Reid
2. S. Robinson
3. P. Cranford
4. M. Alunno‐Bruscia
5. T. Strohmeier
6. Ø. Strand
7. R. Rosland
8. P. Edwards

In Oceanography

1. M. Alunno‐Bruscia
2. S. Robinson
3. T. Strohmeier
4. Ø. Strand
5. P. Cranford
6. G. Reid

Citations in the corpus

• Selective Capture and Ingestion of Particles by Suspension-Feeding Bivalve Molluscs: A Review (2018, unknown): “Static, flow-through, and biodeposition methods have been used to determine CR. Cranford et al. (2011) provided a comprehensive review of the literature regarding these methods as they relate to CR calculations, and the reader is referred to that paper.”
• Open water integrated multi-trophic aquaculture: constraints on the effectiveness of mussels as an organic extractive component (2013, background): “This value is lower than was reported for similar sized mussels feeding on natural seston (3.2 l h−1; Cranford et al. 2011).”
• Variability in particle retention efficiency by the mussel Mytilus edulis (2012, background): “The relative ease of indirectly measuring bivalve clearance rate (Coughlan 1969) using a variety of apparatus (Riisgård 2001) has contributed to a prolific literature (reviewed by Cranford et al. 2011) and requires that a known fixed percentage of particles are retained (100”