“Feminine Protection”: The Effects of Menstruation on Attitudes Towards Women
By Tom Roberts, Jamie L. Goldenberg, Cathleen A. Power, T. Pyszczynski. 2002
200 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Health, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/22e168bf409b793a38d3d2af14b76c0a18cafcd8
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Health
In Social Psychology
Citations in the corpus
- The Menstrual Mark: Menstruation as Social Stigma (2020, background): “Roberts et al. (2002) primed menstrual status by manipulating whether their research assistant dropped a tampon or a hairclip where the participants in the study could see her do it.”
- Leaks, Lumps, and Lines (2011, background): “Similarly, research participants have been observed to stand or sit farther away from pregnant (Taylor & Langer, 1977) and heavyweight women (Hebl & Mannix, 2003), as well as from women they believe are menstruating (Roberts et al., 2002).”
- Average Joes: Men's relationships with media, real bodies, and sexuality (2006, background): “In some cases, men’s discomfort with women’s real body functions may be so strong as to elicit objectification of women, thereby sanitizing the body and relieving the tension brought on by contact with women’s real bodies (Roberts et al., 2002).”
- Objectification Theory and Psychology of Women: A Decade of Advances and Future Directions (2008, background): “Specifically, with a sample of predominantly White college students, Roberts, Goldenberg, Power, and Pyszczynski (2002) manipulated the salience of menstruation by having a confederate woman accidentally pull out a tampon or a hair clip from her bag.”