A spatially unbiased atlas template of the human cerebellum

By Jörn Diedrichsen. NeuroImage, 2006

980 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Neurology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/22d07710f4429cde4604081215ce959985865fc7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Neurology

In Pathology and Forensic Medicine

In Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging

Citations in the corpus

In-Vivo Mapping of the Human Locus Coeruleus (2009, methodology): “An additional consideration is that the studies we reviewed employed whole-brain normalization, which may account for spatial differences in reported locations as previously demonstrated (Diedrichsen, 2006; Napadow et al., 2006).”
Functional topography of the cerebellum for motor and cognitive tasks: an fMRI study (2011, methodology): “The Spatially Unbiased Atlas Template (SUIT) of the cerebellum and brainstem (Diedrichsen, 2006; Diedrichsen et al., 2009) for the SPM Segmentation method and the MRI Atlas of the Human Cerebellum (Schmahmann et al.”
Imaging dopamine receptors in humans with [11C]-(+)-PHNO: Dissection of D3 signal and anatomy (2011, methodology): “Finally, the cerebellum and the brain stemwere manually defined combining information from the SUIT (Diedrichsen, 2006) and ICBM152 templates.”
Functional topography in the human cerebellum: A meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies (2009, neutral): “The SPM nonlinear normalization algorithm to the MNI template can lead to an elongated cerebellum, which may alter the lobular localization of certain coordinates (Diedrichsen, 2006).”
Imaging the deep cerebellar nuclei: A probabilistic atlas and normalization procedure (2011, positive): “Older, yet still commonly-used normalization techniques, are outperformed substantially by more modern techniques such as concurrent segmentation and normalization (Ashburner and Friston, 2005) or cerebellar-only normalization (SUIT, Diedrichsen, 2006).”
Brain templates and atlases (2012, neutral): “Diedrichsen (2006), Diedrichsen et al., 2009, 2010, 2011) therefore developed the Spatially Unbiased Infratentorial Template (SUIT) package, that includes both a cerebellar template from 20 young adults and non-linear normalization, that reduces inter-subject variability in major cerebellar sulcal…”
Lesion identification using unified segmentation-normalisation models and fuzzy clustering (2008, methodology): “In thiscontext, itmight be useful touse more accurate cerebellar templates (for a similar rational see Diedrichsen, 2006).”
Functional grouping and cortical-subcortical interactions in emotion: A meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies (2008, neutral): “However, it is also possible that the inclusion of the superior cerebellum in this functional group is an artifact due to inconsistent spatial normalization across studies, as warping procedures typically behave poorly in this region (Diedrichsen, 2006).”
A probabilistic MR atlas of the human cerebellum (2009, methodology): “5 cm in the common atlas space (Diedrichsen, 2006), an area as wide as the neighboring lobules themselves.”
TRIPLE REPRESENTATION OF LANGUAGE, WORKING MEMORY, SOCIAL AND EMOTION PROCESSING IN THE CEREBELLUM: CONVERGENT EVIDENCE FROM TASK AND SEED-BASED RESTING-STATE FMRI ANALYSES IN A SINGLE LARGE COHORT (2018, methodology): “Thresholded task activation d maps and thresholded resting-state functional connectivity z maps were also visualized on a cerebellar flat map using the SUIT toolbox for SPM (Diedrichsen, 2006; Diedrichsen et al., 2009; Diedrichsen and Zotow, 2015).”
The Cerebellum and Cognition: Evidence from Functional Imaging Studies (2011, background): “1 The human cerebellum with lobules I–X labeled from the spatially unbiased atlas template (SUIT) of the cerebellum and brainstem by Diedrichsen and colleagues [183] (http://www.”