Comparative analysis of cultivated melon groups (Cucumis melo L.) using random amplified polymorphic DNA and simple sequence repeat markers

By J. Staub, Y. Danin-poleg, G. Fazio, Thomas F. Horejsi, N. Reis, N. Katzir. Euphytica, 2000

125 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/22c6165d18b91d7eba7d360c38b5a2b36c69dd5b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Plant Science

1. S. Şensoy
2. K. Abak
3. S. Büyükalaca
4. H. Nybom
5. J. Staub
6. Isabelle Y. Delannay
7. Feishi Luan

Citations in the corpus

• Chinese melon (Cucumis melo L.) diversity analyses provide strategies for germplasm curation, genetic improvement, and evidentiary support of domestication patterns (2008, methodology): “Therefore, we used a previously deWned standard RAPD marker array (Staub et al. 2000), and several morphological traits to: (1) assess the genetic diversity of Chinese melons from diverse geographical origins; (2) determine their relationship to a previously deWned set of African, Japanese, Greek,…”
• Diversity among melon landraces (Cucumis melo L.) from Greece and their genetic relationships with other melon germplasm of diverse origins (2004, methodology): “These analyses genetically defined commonly grown Greek melon cultivars and provided information as to their possible value for the genetic enhancement of U.S., European, and Asian melon market classes.”
• Evaluation of genetic diversity in Turkish melons (Cucumis melo L.) based on phenotypic characters and RAPD markers (2007, methodology): “…increasingly employed in melon genetic studies (Shattuck-Eidens et al. 1990; Neuhausen 1992; Baudracco-Arnas and Pitrat 1996; Katzir et al. 1996; Staub et al. 1997, 2000, 2004; Wang et al. 1997; Garcia et al. 1998; Silberstein et al. 1999, 2003; Stepansky et al. 1999; Garcia-Mas et al. 2000;…”
• Construction of a genetic map of melon with molecular markers and horticultural traits, and localization of genes associated with ZYMV resistance (2002, result): “Other variability studies with DNA markers also indicated that the PI414723 accession was the most distant from all the other accessions examined (Nuehausen, 1992, Silberstein et al., 1999; Staub et al., 2000; Stepansky et al., 1999; Danin-Poleg et al., 2001).”
• Characterization of six varieties of Cucumis melo L. based on morphological and physiological characters, including shelf-life of fruit (2004, background): “…C. melo occurred between vars. cantalupensis, reticulatus and inodorus as one group, and the more ‘exotic’ vars. conomon, makuwa, chito, dudaim, agrestis and momordica, as a second group (Stepansky et al., 1999; Staub et al., 2000; Siberstein et al., 1999; Akashi et al., 2002; Zhang & Wang, 1992).”
• Comparison of different nuclear DNA markers for estimating intraspecific genetic diversity in plants (2004, methodology): “2003), and coefficients of variation per band have been reported to be higher for STMS than RAPD (Staub et al. 2000).”