Accuracy of MSCT coronary angiography with 64-slice technology: first experience.
By S. Leschka, H. Alkadhi, A. Plass, L. Desbiolles, J. Grünenfelder, B. Marincek, S. Wildermuth. European Heart Journal, 2005
1,096 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Biomedical Engineering, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/22b352c07d7eb490afea13bb9b337f90641a1f2b
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Biomedical Engineering
In Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
Citations in the corpus
- Diagnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery disease: results from the prospective multicenter ACCURACY (Assessment by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography of Indi (2008, methodology): “An c verall assessment of image quality and coronary supply domnance was performed on the subject level (4,5).”
- [Guidelines on the management of stable angina pectoris: executive summary]. (2006, methodology): “Studies using 64 detector scanning report sensitivities and specificities of 90–94% and 95–97%, respectively, and importantly, a negative predictive value of 93–99%.(66,67) A conservative suggestion for CT angiography would be in patients with a low pre-test (,10%) probability of disease with an equ”
- Standardized Evaluation Methodology and Reference Database for Evaluating Coronary Artery Centerline Extraction Algorithms (2009, background): “5 mm or larger are assumed to be clinically relevant (Leschka et al., 2005; Ropers et al., 2006).”