Model Formulation: GEM: A Proposal for a More Comprehensive Guideline Document Model Using XML
By R. Shiffman, B. Karras, Abha Agrawal, Roland Chen, Luis N. Marenco, S. Nath. J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc., 2000
322 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: General Health Professions, Health Information Management, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/22ac67a52ad60cbfc93f416ff7dd9ca0e1054358
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In General Health Professions
In Health Information Management
Citations in the corpus
- Comparing computer-interpretable guideline models: a case-study approach. (2003, methodology): “CIG models will require documentation. For example, a model’s authorship, the evidence the guideline is based on, and its intended context of use must all be captured and made available. Currently, only some of these attributes are supported by the various modeling methods, although the rest of them”
- GLIF3: a representation format for sharable computer-interpretable clinical practice guidelines (2004, background): “Preliminary work to add attributes of the Guideline Elements Model (GEM) [43] for narrative guideline markup has been done [44].”
- Computer-interpretable clinical guidelines: A methodological review (2013, unknown): “GEM’s 110 elements relate to a guideline’s identity, developer, purpose, intended audience, method of development, target population, knowledge components, testing, and review plan.”