On the natures of the spin and orbital parts of optical angular momentum
By Stephen M. Barnett, L. Allen, R. Cameron, C. Gilson, Miles J. Padgett, F. Speirits, A. Yao. 2016
173 citations recorded by the source corpus.
The modern field of optical angular momentum began with the realisation by Allen et al in 1992 that, in addition to the spin associated with polarisation, light beams with helical phase fronts carry orbital angular momentum. There has been much confusion and debate, however, surrounding the intricacies of the field and, in particular, the separation of the angular momentum into its spin and orbital parts. Here we take the opportunity to state the current position as we understand it, which we present as six perspectives: (i) we start with a reprise of the 1992 paper in which it was pointed out that the Laguerre–Gaussian modes, familiar from laser physics, carry orbital angular momentum. (ii) The total angular momentum may be separated into spin and orbital parts, but neither alone is a true angular momentum. (iii) The spin and orbital parts, although not themselves true angular momenta, are distinct and physically meaningful, as has been demonstrated clearly in a range of experiments. (iv) The orbital part of the angular momentum in the direction of propagation of a beam is not simply the azimuthal component of the linear momentum. (v) The component of spin in the direction of propagation is not the helicity, although these are related quantities. (vi) Finally, the spin and orbital parts of the angular momentum correspond to distinct symmetries of the free electromagnetic field and hence are separately conserved quantities.
Subfields: Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Biomedical Engineering
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/22a96e6b9513cd09f5167ea3bafac243c6518685
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
- Miles J. Padgett
- Stephen M. Barnett
- Mohamed Babiker
- K. Bliokh
- Franco Nori
- A. Yao
- Yuri Kivshar
- A. Stewart
In Biomedical Engineering
Citations in the corpus
- Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A : Mathematical (2017, background): “A more complete discussion of this subtlety is given in [8].”