An unexpected feature of the stress–strain diagram of dual-phase steel

By U. Liedl, S. Traint, E. Werner. 2002

136 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Materials Chemistry, Mechanical Engineering, Mechanics of Materials

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/229bf66c99c1ecd5d5a3c02c3b449c1e6904211b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Materials Chemistry

1. Dierk Raabe
2. Franz Roters
3. M. Diehl
4. C. Tasan
5. Philip Eisenlohr
6. D. Ponge
7. Motomichi Koyama
8. K. Tsuzaki

In Mechanical Engineering

1. Dierk Raabe
2. Franz Roters
3. C. Tasan
4. M. Diehl
5. Philip Eisenlohr
6. K. Tsuzaki
7. Motomichi Koyama
8. D. Ponge

In Mechanics of Materials

1. Franz Roters
2. Dierk Raabe
3. M. Diehl
4. Philip Eisenlohr
5. C. Tasan
6. Duancheng Ma
7. Dingshun Yan
8. Pratheek Shanthraj

Citations in the corpus

• Quantification of the effect of transformation-induced geometrically necessary dislocations on the flow-curve modelling of dual-phase steels (2013, methodology): “However, Liedl et al. (2002) found that the yield stress of DP steel does depend on the martensite content.”
• An Overview of Dual-Phase Steels: Advances in Microstructure-Oriented Processing and Micromechanically Guided Design (2015, background): “(174) provided an early example of how idealized models can answer a specific question.”
• DAMASK – The Düsseldorf Advanced Material Simulation Kit for modeling multi-physics crystal plasticity, thermal, and damage phenomena from the single crystal up to the component scale (2018, background): “Setting up such models in a continuum micromechanical framework allowed to study the response of ferritic–austenitic duplex stainless steels in thermo-mechanical loading scenarios [222] or the deformation behavior of ferritic–martensitic Dual Phase (DP) steels [223,224].”