Geodesic flow on the diffeomorphism group of the circle
By Adrian Constantin, Boris Kolev. 2003
384 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Applied Mathematics, Geometry and Topology, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/229809362922ed5ce7440aadc03688331463783b
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Applied Mathematics
- Yue Liu
- Zhaoyang Yin
- Changzheng Qu
- Joachim Escher
- Giuseppe Maria Coclite
- Kenneth Hvistendahl Karlsen
- Yong Zhou
- Ying Fu
In Geometry and Topology
In Statistical and Nonlinear Physics
- Yue Liu
- Zhaoyang Yin
- Changzheng Qu
- Joachim Escher
- Ying Fu
- Yong Zhou
- Giuseppe Maria Coclite
- Kenneth Hvistendahl Karlsen
Citations in the corpus
- Infinite propagation speed for a two component Camassa-Holm equation (2009, background): “It is interesting to note that for the CH equation these diffeomorphisms have a geometric interpretation in the context of geodesic flow [ 19 , 18], however currently no such interpretation exists for this two-component generalisation.”
- Global Existence and Blow-Up Phenomena for the Degasperis-Procesi Equation (2006, methodology): “Furthermore, the Camassa-Holm equation is a re-expression of geodesic flow on the diffeomorphism group [ 13 ] or on the Bott-Virasoro group [40], while no geometric derivation of the Degasperis-Procesi equation is available.”
- Inverse scattering transform for the Camassa–Holm equation (2006, background): “CH also arises as an equation of the geodesic flow for the H 1 right-invariant metrics on the Bott–Virasoro group (if ω > 0) and on the diffeomorphism group (if ω = 0) [8, 12, 13, 34].”
- Some Geometric Evolution Equations Arising as Geodesic Equations on Groups of Diffeomorphisms Including the Hamiltonian Approach (2006, methodology): “But there is a mistake in [13], p 795, where the authors assume that composition and inversion on H(S(1)) are smooth.”
- Compactly Supported Solutions of the Camassa-Holm Equation (2005, background): “4) is not accidental: it represents the conservation of momentum in the physical variables (see [10, 11]).”
- On the Blow-up Phenomena for the Degasperis–Procesi Equation (2010, methodology): “Both the KdV equation [20] and the Camassa-Holm equation [1, 6, 8, 13, 14] are completely integrable models for the propagation of shallow water waves.”
- On the Regularity of the Composition of Diffeomorphisms (2011, methodology): “In particular, Riemann exponential maps have been studied in [10], [11], [20], [21].”
- WELL-POSEDNESS OF HIGHER-ORDER CAMASSA-HOLM EQUATIONS (2009, methodology): “1) reads in the cases k = 0, 1, 2, 3 as follows [14].”
- Traveling wave solutions of the Degasperis-Procesi equation (2005, background): “3) is a re-expression of geodesic flow [4,7,18] whereas no such geo interpretation is valid for (1.”
- Geodesic distance for right invariant Sobolev metrics of fractional order on the diffeomorphism group (2011, background): “and for s > 1 they are related to the higher order Camassa Holm equations, see [5].”