The Economics of CO2 Transport by Pipeline and Storage in Saline Aquifers and Oil Reservoirs
By S. McCoy. 2008
138 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Environmental Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Ocean Engineering
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/228e2b013ebc35964727c44bcdef8b108301ac5f
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Environmental Engineering
In Mechanical Engineering
In Ocean Engineering
Citations in the corpus
- Economic Co-optimization of Enhanced Oil Recovery and Carbon Sequestration (2011, unknown): “Based mainly on data in McCoy (2008), and again applying a scaling factor of 1/40 to LSTP’s number of wells and CO2 throughput, we set the conversion cost at $0.6 million and the recyling-plant at $2.1 million, for an overall up-front cost of $2.7 million.”
- Prospects of carbon capture and storage (CCS) in India’s power sector – An integrated assessment (2014, unknown): “Estimates for CO2 transportation costs via pipeline are based on [14,64,68].”
- A techno-economic case study of CO2 capture, transport and storage chain from a cement plant in Norway (2017, methodology): “Indeed, even if the conditioning costs are lower in the case of pipeline transport [31], pipeline CO2 transport is an extremely cost-inefficient method for transport of small volumes over long distances, as shown in Figure 9 and as documented in the literature [25, 27].”