Do Advocacy Coalitions Matter? Crisis and Change in Swedish Nuclear Energy Policy

135 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Crisis, learning and policy change in the European Union (2017, background): “Inter-crisis management allows time to learn lessons between a crisis and the next – although this does not mean that learning processes are necessarily smooth (Birkland 2004; Boin et al. 2009; Nohrstedt 2009; Stern 1997).”
Integrating techno-economic, socio-technical and political perspectives on national energy transitions: A meta-theoretical framework (2018, methodology): “16 Nohrstedt [147] used ACF to explain Swedish nuclear energy policy by focusing on the 1980 referendum on nuclear energy, which was initiated by the Social Democratic Party not because of its party members’ views on nuclear power, but because of the upcoming electoral campaign.”
Re-municipalisation in the early twenty-first century: water in France and energy in Germany (2013, background): “It has however been argued that recognising strategic interests as a determinant of policy outcome would enhance its explanatory potential (Nohrstedt 2010).”