Climate Change and Financial Instability: Risk Disclosure and the Problematics of Neoliberal Governance

158 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Finance

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Climate finance and disclosure for institutional investors: why transparency is not enough (2019, background): “…opportunities to global scrutiny for all themain financial actors will cause investors (i) tomove away from carbon-intensive assets to reduce risks and (ii) tomove into low carbon opportunities to benefit from the enhancedmarket and value of low-carbon investments (Christophers 2017; Chenet 2019a).”
Environmental Beta or How Institutional Investors Think about Climate Change and Fossil Fuel Risk (2019, background): “The article thus lends further substance to my earlier (Christophers 2017) critique of disclosure-based approaches to the financial stability risk of climate change, which questioned the conviction that disclosure alone will abet a smooth transition in financial markets, specifically by…”
Climate finance governance: Fit for purpose? (2021, background): “…neoliberal modality of governance” in relation to climate change: where the rationality of investors is taken as a given; where “market discipline” is prioritized; and where climate change is understood as a financial stability risk which demands risk disclosure (Christophers, 2017: 1108).”