Weakly Relative Poverty

By M. Ravallion, Shaohua Chen. Review of Economics and Statistics, 2009

230 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Abstract Prevailing measures of relative poverty are unchanged when all incomes grow or contract by the same proportion. This property stems from seemingly implausible assumptions about the disutility of relative deprivation and the cost of social inclusion. We propose “weakly relative” lines that relax these assumptions. On calibrating our measures to national poverty lines and survey data, we find that half the population of the developing world in 2005 lived in poverty, only half of whom were absolutely poor. The total number of poor rose over 1981 to 2005 despite falling numbers of absolutely poor. With sustained economic growth, the incidence of relative poverty became less responsive to further growth. The number of relatively poor rose, just as the numbers of absolutely poor fell.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Sociology and Political Science, Soil Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/22629abc0c6a0bc3840d66c6e76cbc668583b2b3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

  1. E. Thorbecke
  2. J. Greer
  3. James E. Foster
  4. David Rosenblatt
  5. F. Im
  6. M. Ravallion
  7. Stefan Dercon
  8. A. Fosu

In Sociology and Political Science

  1. E. Thorbecke
  2. James E. Foster
  3. J. Greer
  4. David Rosenblatt
  5. F. Im
  6. M. Ravallion
  7. Stefan Dercon
  8. A. Fosu

In Soil Science

  1. James E. Foster
  2. J. Greer
  3. E. Thorbecke
  4. F. Im
  5. David Rosenblatt
  6. M. Ravallion
  7. Stefan Dercon
  8. Christopher B. Barrett

Citations in the corpus