The shape of the gravitational potential in cold dark matter haloes

By E. Hayashi, J. Navarro, V. S. M. Garching, U. Victoria. 2006

134 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We use a set of cosmological N-body simulations to investigate the structural shape of galaxysized cold dark matter (CDM) haloes. Unlike most previous work on the subject ‐ which dealt with shapes as measured by the inertia tensor ‐ we focus here on the shape of the gravitational potential, a quantity more directly relevant to comparison with observational probes. A further advantage is that the potential is less sensitive to the effects of substructure and, as a consequence, the isopotential surfaces are typically smooth and well approximated by concentric ellipsoids. Our main result is that the asphericity of the potential increases rapidly towards the centre of the halo. The radial trend is more pronounced than expected from constant flattening in the mass distribution, and reflects a strong tendency for dark matter haloes to become increasingly aspherical inwards. Near the centre the halo potential is approximately prolate on average [(c/a)0 = 0.72 ± 0.04, (b/a)0 = 0.78 ± 0.08], but it becomes less axisymmetric and more spherical in the outer regions. The principal axes of the isopotential surfaces remain well aligned, and in most haloes the angular momentum tends to be parallel to the minor axis and perpendicular to the major axis. This suggests that galactic discs may form in a plane where the potential is elliptical and where its ellipticity varies rapidly with radius. This can result in significant deviations from circular motion in systems such as low surface brightness (LSB) galaxies, even for relatively minor deviations from circular symmetry. Simulated long-slit rotation curves often appear similar to those of LSBs cited as evidence for constant density ‘cores’. This suggests that taking into account the 3D shape of the dark mass distribution might help to reconcile such evidence with the cuspy mass profile of CDM haloes.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/225342c3828e5484ecdd0fcc9c27528ba7722540

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. Volker Springel
  2. Simon D. M. White
  3. James S. Bullock
  4. P. Hopkins
  5. L. Hernquist
  6. M. Boylan-Kolchin
  7. Carlos S. Frenk
  8. Andrey V. Kravtsov

In Instrumentation

  1. Volker Springel
  2. Simon D. M. White
  3. Carlos S. Frenk
  4. L. Hernquist
  5. P. Hopkins
  6. M. Boylan-Kolchin
  7. James S. Bullock
  8. Adrian Jenkins

Citations in the corpus