Non-covalent interactions across organic and biological subsets of chemical space: Physics-based potentials parametrized from machine learning.

By T. Bereau, Robert A. Distasio Jr., Alexandre Tkatchenko, O. A. von Lilienfeld. 2017

165 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Classical intermolecular potentials typically require an extensive parametrization procedure for any new compound considered. To do away with prior parametrization, we propose a combination of physics-based potentials with machine learning (ML), coined IPML, which is transferable across small neutral organic and biologically relevant molecules. ML models provide on-the-fly predictions for environment-dependent local atomic properties: electrostatic multipole coefficients (significant error reduction compared to previously reported), the population and decay rate of valence atomic densities, and polarizabilities across conformations and chemical compositions of H, C, N, and O atoms. These parameters enable accurate calculations of intermolecular contributions-electrostatics, charge penetration, repulsion, induction/polarization, and many-body dispersion. Unlike other potentials, this model is transferable in its ability to handle new molecules and conformations without explicit prior parametrization: All local atomic properties are predicted from ML, leaving only eight global parameters-optimized once and for all across compounds. We validate IPML on various gas-phase dimers at and away from equilibrium separation, where we obtain mean absolute errors between 0.4 and 0.7 kcal/mol for several chemically and conformationally diverse datasets representative of non-covalent interactions in biologically relevant molecules. We further focus on hydrogen-bonded complexes-essential but challenging due to their directional nature-where datasets of DNA base pairs and amino acids yield an extremely encouraging 1.4 kcal/mol error. Finally, and as a first look, we consider IPML for denser systems: water clusters, supramolecular host-guest complexes, and the benzene crystal.

Subfields: Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Materials Chemistry, Physical and Theoretical Chemistry

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics

  1. Alán Aspuru-Guzik
  2. Jonny Proppe
  3. Pascal Friederich
  4. Florian Hase

In Materials Chemistry

  1. Florian Hase
  2. Pascal Friederich
  3. Jonny Proppe
  4. Alán Aspuru-Guzik
  5. José Miguel Hernández-Lobato
  6. Ryan-Rhys Griffiths
  7. Tommi S. Jaakkola
  8. Nicholas J. Schork

In Physical and Theoretical Chemistry

  1. Alán Aspuru-Guzik
  2. Jonny Proppe
  3. Pascal Friederich
  4. Florian Hase

Citations in the corpus