In situ with bystanders of augmented reality glasses: perspectives on recording and privacy-mediating technologies

By Tamara Denning, Zakariya Dehlawi, Tadayoshi Kohno. 2014

272 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

I-Pic: A Platform for Privacy-Compliant Image Capture (2016, background): “[34] conduct a large scale user survey to understand bystanders’ privacy concerns in public places like coffee shops and possible ways to mitigate them.”
Deepdiary: Lifelogging image captioning and summarization (2018, background): “From a privacy and security perspective, for example, Denning et al. [20] and Nguyen et al. [69] study how bystanders react to wearable cameras, while Hoyle et al. [39] identify privacy risks to the camera wearers themselves.”
Enhancing Lifelogging Privacy by Detecting Screens (2016, background): “Hoyle et al. [16] explore privacy issues and concerns of lifeloggers, while Denning et al. [11] consider the privacy implications of the bystanders who are photographed by wearable cameras.”
Courteous glass (2014, background): “H.5.1 [Information interfaces and presentation (e.g., HCI)]: Multimedia Information Systems.”
World-Driven Access Control for Continuous Sensing (2014, unknown): “veyed design axes for privacy-mediation approaches [11].”
Privacy behaviors of lifeloggers using wearable cameras (2014, background): “[10] studied how people respond to the presence of augmented reality wearable devices.”